It looks like the whole ‘28’ motif will continue, too. It’ll be interesting to see where the story picks up in the forthcoming sequel - has the rest of continental Europe been contaminated, too? Or maybe it’s gone global? Here’s everything we know so far.Īfter a Rage-ravaged and quarantined Britain was depicted in the first two films, the ending of 28 Weeks Later appeared to show that the infection had finally reached the streets of Paris.
While it looks like we’ll have to wait a little while longer for the arrival of 28 Weeks Later 3, there’s still a good amount of information about the movie out there to get excited about. Talk of a third film, once tentatively titled 28 Months Later, has circulated in the 12 years since, and now Boyle has got us all excited again by saying that he and Alex Garland, the screenwriter of 28 Days Later, have devised a “wonderful idea” for a new movie. Surveying the eerily quiet landscape on a rubbish-strewn Westminster Bridge, this disquieting scene has long been hailed as one of British cinema’s greatest-ever opening sequences.Ģ8 Days Later revitalised the zombie horror genre, and a not-quite-as-brilliant sequel, 28 Weeks Later, inevitably followed in 2007. Danny Boyle’s film will long be remembered for its opening alone, where the protagonist Jim (played by a young Cillian Murphy) wakes up from a coma in an empty hospital before emerging bleary-eyed into a totally deserted London.
#28 days later movie clips tv
Sign Up: Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here.17 years on, 28 Days Later remains a chilling watch.
#28 days later movie clips series
Boyle is back in theaters this month with “Yesterday,” while Garland is the creator of FX’s upcoming science-ficion drama series “Devs.” Garland’s quote had many fans at the time wondering if two more “28 Days Later” films would be coming, but development on a third movie has yet to start. … It’s more likely to be ’28 Months’ than ’28 Years.’ 28 months gives you one more place to go.” Danny and Andrew and I have been having quite serious conversations about it so it is a possibility. “We’ve just started talking about it seriously,” Garland told IGN in 2015. Both films were well-received by horror fans, many of whom have been anticipating a third project that Garland has teased would be “28 Months Later.” “28 Weeks Later” was less successful but still turned a profit with $65 million worldwide on a $15 million budget. The film made $85 million at the worldwide box office on a production budget of only $8 million. “28 Weeks Later” was a critical and commercial success when it opened in fall 2002. Garland has since become an acclaimed director in his own right thanks to “Ex Machina” and “Annihilation.”ĭanny Boyle to Direct Sex Pistols Limited Series for FXĪlex Garland and A24 Reuniting After 'Ex Machina' for New Film, Jessie Buckley Eyed to StarĮmmy Predictions: Best Supporting Actor in a Drama Series - Upsets BrewingĮmmy Predictions: Best Actor in a Drama Series - One More for Porter, or a First for O'Connor? Both Boyle and Garland served as executive producers on the 2007 sequel “28 Weeks Later,” directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo.
Prior to the film’s release, Boyle adapted Garland’s novel “The Beach” into a film starring Leonardo DiCaprio. Garland made his screenwriting debut with “28 Days Later,” which IndieWire recently named the 14th greatest horror movie ever made.